POD Publishers
Jan. 21st, 2008 05:19 pmHere is an interesting comparison of Lulu and Lightning Source as potential places to turn a manuscript into a paper book. If you want to share your work with an audience, and you know your readers are into hardcopies, it's worth doing some comparison shopping to find the best place for your needs.
Edit: Here's another thread on the same blog that compares different types of printing services:
http://drivingblind.livejournal.com/315530.html
Edit: Here's another thread on the same blog that compares different types of printing services:
http://drivingblind.livejournal.com/315530.html
(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-21 11:37 pm (UTC)On the occult/pagan end of things, Immanion uses LS, which only deals with professional publishing companies, not individul self-publishers. LS automatically gets you into Amazon.com, Baker and Taylor, and Ingram for no extra charge (I believe Lulu charges extra to get you into Amazon, and doesn't get you into B&T and Ingram). Plus with LS you do have to have your own block of ISBN #s, whereas Lulu will sell them to you individually (I'm guessing at a profit).
One of the biggest issues with Lulu is that their basic cost for printing is higher per book, which makes it tougher to give the necessary discounts that distributors such as New Leaf want. If you want to have your books in brick and mortar bookstores at all, Lulu isn't that great a choice, unless you want to do the distribution yourself and buy a bunch at a bulk discount, or unless the stores use the wholesaler that Lulu uses.
I know small presses that use LS, ones that use Lulu, and ones that will cough up the money for short run traditional printings.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-22 02:28 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-22 03:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-22 12:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-22 01:22 am (UTC)