By way of
padhopper:
From
beckyzooleIn a post in the lj_2008 community, theljstaff has apologized for not giving the LJ Community of Users a chance to comment before they removed the option to open new Basic accounts.
"The announcement last Wednesday was a mistake in regards to Basic accounts, as the change was not clearly stated", the announcement clarifies, "it did not allow for you to provide feedback, and went into effect immediately."
"Many of you have pointed out that the decision worried you less than the way it was communicated. You should have been given a voice, and you were not; we didn't follow our own rules, and we apologize."
While not apologizing for the removal of the Basic account option itself, theljstaff confirms Anton Nossik's earlier suggestion of a compromise, saying that LJ is "considering options which would allow existing users to continue to create new Basic accounts".
The post lists several development priorities for 2008. And it asks for feedback on these priorities, including such "Open Questions" as how best to integrate ads and other "commercial opportunities" into LJ.
One question that is already gathering much attention in the comments is "Should moderators be able to charge for access to closed communities?"
theljstaff promises that LJ "will carefully consider your comments and together with Advisory Board post the final plan after the user elections in May."
Many thanks to kblcbka for being the first to comment in my journal about the post in lj_2008, and for saying that "It's a real inspiration to see the "Russian-langugage segment" and the "English-langugage segment" join together and actually achieve"
----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
Friends, we have not won. But we have been heard.
LiveJournal has not told us why interests such as "depression" and "sex" were removed from the Popular Interests List, then replaced with no more explanation than "it was a mistake".
But it has replaced them.
LiveJournal has not given the Advisory Board a voice in this announcement.
But it has promised to involve them in the future.
LiveJournal has not restored the option to open new Basic accounts for new members.
But it has indicated willingness to develop a method that will allow existing users to open additional Basic accounts.
Clearly and unequivocally, LiveJournal has promised to inform users before any further change to the site that affects how we use the site, or demands on our resources.
Please continue to join me on Friday in a Content Strike -- not so much as an act of anger as an act of integrity.
We will demonstrate that we follow through on what we promise, even if LiveJournal doesn't.
We will not be bought off with an empty apology, but we are willing to let LiveJournal demonstrate that their apology is sincere. This Friday, let your silence be your voice.
LiveJournal Content Strike, Friday, March 21, midnight to midnight GMT.
Один день без контента
No posts. No comments. No content. * * *
I will still be participating in the strike. I also plan to give LJ some more input on proposed changes, good and bad, and ideas for making money without driving us nuts.