>>But then, the mainstream thinks it's okay to approve birth control that can cause crippling or fatal blood clots, despite already having other means of birth control that don't kill anyone.<<
I read somewhere that one of the delays in developing birth control for men* is that experimental safety standards have improved in the past several decades. So wht was acceptable in the development of female birth control in the...what? 1950's? is now a big no-no.
*Not counting condoms, they were originally developed to prevent syphilis, not babies, if I remember right.
>>I agree. I use scent a lot.<<
Actually, come to think of it - scent is so unnoticed in thus culture most people wont think to fake it, or disguise it, if they even can. (People make fake flower smells, but they dont make fake personal smells.) That could have interesting implications for being used as a form of reassurance or trust password...
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
dancing_serpent
Re: Thoughts
Date: 2021-10-26 02:21 pm (UTC)I read somewhere that one of the delays in developing birth control for men* is that experimental safety standards have improved in the past several decades. So wht was acceptable in the development of female birth control in the...what? 1950's? is now a big no-no.
*Not counting condoms, they were originally developed to prevent syphilis, not babies, if I remember right.
>>I agree. I use scent a lot.<<
Actually, come to think of it - scent is so unnoticed in thus culture most people wont think to fake it, or disguise it, if they even can. (People make fake flower smells, but they dont make fake personal smells.) That could have interesting implications for being used as a form of reassurance or trust password...