Concrete vs. Abstract Thought
Jul. 7th, 2019 12:38 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
... influences preferences in buying offline or online. This study suggests that concrete thinkers prefer shopping offline where they can touch things, while abstract thinkers prefer shopping online.
It misses some other factors, though.
* If the desired item is not widely available, that pushes people to shop online. So online sellers can capitalize on this by offering things that are hard to find. They'll have a harder time competing with common items.
* If the desired item has a tactile component, or reveals more information when closely examined, offline sellers have the advantage. Take the example, a mug -- if I can see it, I can tell whether the appearance pleases me and estimate the weight. That's enough to tell me whether or not I'd probably want to buy it. But for clothes, I have to try them on, because texture and fit are paramount. For a book, if it's by an unfamiliar author, I want the freedom to flip through it; and I want the opportunity to browse items on a shelf. Online suppliers can't meet these needs. However, if all I need to know is that a favorite author has released the next book in a series I enjoy, then I can buy online. Offline sellers can capitalize on these aspects by emphasizing traits that don't carry online, such as the texture of fabric or the smell of leather.
As you can guess from the above, I'm fluent in both concrete and abstract thinking, but I tend to use them in different contexts.
It misses some other factors, though.
* If the desired item is not widely available, that pushes people to shop online. So online sellers can capitalize on this by offering things that are hard to find. They'll have a harder time competing with common items.
* If the desired item has a tactile component, or reveals more information when closely examined, offline sellers have the advantage. Take the example, a mug -- if I can see it, I can tell whether the appearance pleases me and estimate the weight. That's enough to tell me whether or not I'd probably want to buy it. But for clothes, I have to try them on, because texture and fit are paramount. For a book, if it's by an unfamiliar author, I want the freedom to flip through it; and I want the opportunity to browse items on a shelf. Online suppliers can't meet these needs. However, if all I need to know is that a favorite author has released the next book in a series I enjoy, then I can buy online. Offline sellers can capitalize on these aspects by emphasizing traits that don't carry online, such as the texture of fabric or the smell of leather.
As you can guess from the above, I'm fluent in both concrete and abstract thinking, but I tend to use them in different contexts.
(no subject)
Date: 2019-07-07 07:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2019-07-07 05:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2019-07-07 11:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2019-07-07 11:44 pm (UTC)OTOH, shoes. I have bought shoes online, more than 10 years ago, and was extremely dissatisfied with the experience. My local shoe store, which is the only one that carries shoes in my size, has salespeople who are well acquainted with how the shoes fit: this one has a larger toe box, that one doesn't have arch support. They bring out only the shoes they think will work for me.
Thoughts
Date: 2019-07-08 12:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2019-07-08 01:48 am (UTC)I don't fit average women's things. I can buy men's stuff online for me and be *reasonably* certain it'll fit (yay standard sizing!) but rarely women's stuff. I *must* try on ladieswear in person, poke and prod and test the fabric, and see if it's ACTUALLY washable (because so much says "dry clean only" on the women's side of the rack.)
(Or I can make it myself. But I'm no tailor, I can screw up a medieval pattern, and they're pretty simple...)
(no subject)
Date: 2019-07-08 01:59 am (UTC)