#pocketwin: Lagenlook Aprons
Jun. 27th, 2019 10:01 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
While researching something else, I stumbled across lagenlook aprons. These come in nice fabrics with big pockets, and are designed to be worn over other clothes. They differ from kitchen aprons in that they are meant as fashion wear, not just for messy tasks; but they still add pockets for practicality. Alas, they are also ruinously expensive; see examples from America and England.
However, aprons are among the easiest garments to make. Even if you can't sew, you could probably make one with fabric glue or ironing tape. You just take a rectangle of fabric, taper the top if you wish, put a wide strip across the bottom and make channels to divide that into pockets, then attach a neck loop or ties and waist ties. You can actually put a lot more pockets than that, but remember weight; the more pockets you want, the heavier the fabric needs to be. For a lightweight fashion fabric like calico, one bottom row is probably plenty. With denim, you can trick it out like a carpenter's apron if you want to.
Here are some patterns so you can make your own tie-on pocket garment:
https://www.hgtv.com/design/make-and-celebrate/handmade/make-a-no-sew-waist-apron
https://shop.mybluprint.com/sewing/article/how-to-sew-an-apron/
https://www.threadsmagazine.com/2012/01/16/free-patterns-for-three-apron-styles
https://abeautifulmess.com/2018/01/sew-your-own-half-apron.html
https://weallsew.com/charming-pocket-apron/
https://www.allfreesewing.com/Aprons
However, aprons are among the easiest garments to make. Even if you can't sew, you could probably make one with fabric glue or ironing tape. You just take a rectangle of fabric, taper the top if you wish, put a wide strip across the bottom and make channels to divide that into pockets, then attach a neck loop or ties and waist ties. You can actually put a lot more pockets than that, but remember weight; the more pockets you want, the heavier the fabric needs to be. For a lightweight fashion fabric like calico, one bottom row is probably plenty. With denim, you can trick it out like a carpenter's apron if you want to.
Here are some patterns so you can make your own tie-on pocket garment:
https://www.hgtv.com/design/make-and-celebrate/handmade/make-a-no-sew-waist-apron
https://shop.mybluprint.com/sewing/article/how-to-sew-an-apron/
https://www.threadsmagazine.com/2012/01/16/free-patterns-for-three-apron-styles
https://abeautifulmess.com/2018/01/sew-your-own-half-apron.html
https://weallsew.com/charming-pocket-apron/
https://www.allfreesewing.com/Aprons
(no subject)
Date: 2019-06-29 06:17 pm (UTC)I am also broad-shouldered. I learned to make my own suits (I'm a retired attorney, so suits were an absolute necessity) for that reason. Size 12 in the shoulders and upper back, size 6 in around my torso (back in the day; now I'm a 20 all over) - by the time something fit in the shoulders it hung like a sack everywhere else, and if it fit in the torso I could tear out the shoulders the first time I put my arms forward.
So, definitions: "Loose" is more than 6 inches of ease. If my blouse is more than 6" greater in diameter than I am, I consider it loose. Shoulders/upper back should have enough ease to move freely.
Long is defined in reference to the body it goes on. Standard shirt length should be 4-6" below your waist...wherever that is. Tunic length is about 2-4" longer.
So I'm not talking about or going by "standard" measurements. I'm talking about what would be comfortably loose but not baggy, and of a reasonable length, on you, not on some mythical "average person".
(no subject)
Date: 2019-06-29 11:13 pm (UTC)I wish shirts came in standard length. There is no reason I should have shirts that don't stay tucked. Or sleeves that are too short.
(no subject)
Date: 2019-06-30 02:39 am (UTC)LOL! Thank you!
>>There is no reason I should have shirts that don't stay tucked. Or sleeves that are too short.<<
I couldn't agree more. :(
(no subject)
Date: 2019-06-30 03:30 am (UTC)Given that I'm a half-size and nothing is in half-sizes (at least not patterns) and I am good in a man's size 40 jacket as far as the shoulders are concerned, I should have tails aplenty. And I do if I buy my shirts by neck size. Distaff shirts for some reason want to divulge things better kept undercover.
And why don't they put the shirt pockets on the sleeves, when it's a blouse?
Well ...
Date: 2019-07-01 12:44 am (UTC)I also think that many other women only put up with bad designs for lack of better options, because plenty of small businesses that start up to solve clothing problems wind up doing quite well.
Re: Well ...
Date: 2019-07-01 02:27 am (UTC)I recommend reading The Lost Art of Dress.
Re: Well ...
Date: 2019-07-01 02:41 am (UTC)Re: Well ...
Date: 2019-07-01 02:53 am (UTC)And it's very hard to find good patterns that address sizing issues. (I know that the catalogs of patterns for several lines are now open source, but printing them is going to be a deal.)
Re: Well ...
Date: 2019-07-01 04:31 am (UTC)That depends on what you are trying beat them at. I made better looking and fitting clothes in high school. Probably before then. Cheaper? Well, maybe not cheaper to make. But if you divide the cost by number of wears, then cheaper over the life of the product. Hell, the only place I can leave a raw seam on a garment is inside a collar. Everything else is rolled or Frenched or otherwise finished.
>> And it's very hard to find good patterns that address sizing issues. (I know that the catalogs of patterns for several lines are now open source, but printing them is going to be a deal.) <<
True, but I have found that drafting isn't that hard. It's harder than making an easy pattern, but it's easier than making something fussy like a fitted blouse. It gets even easier when you look at base concepts -- there are only so many ways to make a sleeve hole or a bodice or a skirt, even if there are a zillion fashion variations on sleeves or trim. Once you have the measurements and a garment in mind, the pattern almost draws itself; it's just a little geometry and connect-the-dots.
Re: Well ...
Date: 2019-07-01 05:30 pm (UTC)And now even 'pricey' fabrics aren't needfully very good quality, and life is too short sewing bad cloth.
The Lost Art of Dress gives an account of a woman who back in the day had such boss skills she could look at a thrift shop item, know that it was sufficient for her cut down needs, and then utterly remake the garment into something no one would guess had had a prior life.
Re: Well ...
Date: 2019-07-01 05:37 pm (UTC)Agreed.
>> And now even 'pricey' fabrics aren't needfully very good quality, and life is too short sewing bad cloth.<<
I love the latter part as a quote. :D
I do know one reliable source for high-quality fabric, quilt shops, but expect to pay through the nose for it.
>>The Lost Art of Dress gives an account of a woman who back in the day had such boss skills she could look at a thrift shop item, know that it was sufficient for her cut down needs, and then utterly remake the garment into something no one would guess had had a prior life.<<
Impressive!
Re: Well ...
Date: 2019-07-01 06:36 pm (UTC)I love the latter part as a quote. :D
Needs to be cross-stitched in a biker/tattoo script.
Quilt shops tend not to be on bus routes. I miss when regular fabric shops could make their money turning over their stock and weren't gambling on Ladies That Power Suit Lunch buying a serger.
The book is well worth the read, that story is just one of many that should have more distribution.
Yes ...
Date: 2019-07-01 12:47 am (UTC)Re: Yes ...
Date: 2019-07-01 02:32 am (UTC)