Poem: "Why I Named My Pet Rock Mom"
Feb. 20th, 2019 02:23 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
This poem was inspired by the story "Hello, Rachel Eastwitch" by
dialecticdreamer. It also fills the "parent" square in my 5-1-18 Gimmicks / Roles / Characters card for the Pro Wrestling Bingo fest. It has been sponsored by
bairnsidhe. This poem belongs to the Mercedes thread of the Polychrome Heroics series.
Warning: The backstory includes serious abuse.
"Why I Named My Pet Rock 'Mom'
or, 10 Ways a Smooth Stone Is Better Than an Abusive Parent"
A pet rock is old and has seen it all before.
A pet rock will always be there for me.
A pet rock will listen to anything I tell it.
A pet rock can't stalk me and my family.
A pet rock will never let me down.
A pet rock will never call me useless.
A pet rock will never badmouth me to other people.
A pet rock will never mess with my education.
A pet rock will never hit me, or hit anyone I love.
A pet rock will never pretend to love me and then hurt me.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Warning: The backstory includes serious abuse.
"Why I Named My Pet Rock 'Mom'
or, 10 Ways a Smooth Stone Is Better Than an Abusive Parent"
A pet rock is old and has seen it all before.
A pet rock will always be there for me.
A pet rock will listen to anything I tell it.
A pet rock can't stalk me and my family.
A pet rock will never let me down.
A pet rock will never call me useless.
A pet rock will never badmouth me to other people.
A pet rock will never mess with my education.
A pet rock will never hit me, or hit anyone I love.
A pet rock will never pretend to love me and then hurt me.
Re: Am now--
Date: 2019-02-22 01:54 am (UTC)Re: Am now--
Date: 2019-02-22 02:37 am (UTC)>_<
>> That's pretty typical right now, since it's less likely that those involved in taking depositions will BLAB-- because of the ages of Bennett when he left and Jules when she tried to go for a direct attack.<<
That makes sense. There's very good grounds for charging her with assorted counts of abuse.
>> HERE, yeah, people let things slip and shrug off the violation of privacy.<<
It happens in T-America too -- look at Shiv -- but much less often, and other people are more likely to disapprove and make an issue of it.
Re: Am now--
Date: 2019-02-22 03:18 am (UTC)JUST the fact that Rachel never paid a penny of child support will tear away a lot of the AUTOMATIC "side with the woman" thinking. SHE is the deadbeat parent in this case, and it shows.
Re: Am now--
Date: 2019-02-22 07:22 am (UTC)That's good.
>> JUST the fact that Rachel never paid a penny of child support will tear away a lot of the AUTOMATIC "side with the woman" thinking. SHE is the deadbeat parent in this case, and it shows.<<
Yeah, since she and Bennett never made an agreement on that topic, the state is free to do it for them using standard measures, plus damages. :D
Re: Am now--
Date: 2019-02-22 02:35 pm (UTC)