My partner Doug tipped me to this article about a settlement near Stonehenge that demonstrates the area was occupied permanently rather than temporarily.
I think I recall reading somewhere that someone who lived in a town with a major annual festival drawing lots of tourism looked at the habitation patterns of Stonehenge and went "...festival town. am I seriously the first person to see this?"
Homo sapiens sapiens are DEFINITELY party animals, and everything ELSE in the fossil/archaeological records supports this. Why WOULDN'T there be an "economy" - and I use quotes only because I'm not confident of my memory of social anthropology, which is about eight years old at the moment.
I think my favorite part of that article is the fact that there was a woodhenge there before the stonehenge. For some reason that just really amuses me.
(no subject)
Date: 2014-05-10 07:47 pm (UTC)Party animals
Date: 2014-05-11 04:01 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2014-05-11 02:55 pm (UTC)Yes...
Date: 2014-05-11 04:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2014-05-11 05:20 pm (UTC)