>> Bruce sadly is damaged in ways all too common. <<
That's true. The portrayal in The Avengers is the most broken I've ever seen, and a lot more plausible based on the horrific background. You can see in the way Bruce moves that he expects to be hit or yelled at, and he's just resigned to it. I think that's what makes Tony and JARVIS so protective of him from the beginning, and later on, the other Avengers.
>> Bucky and Steve have got motion tape from their time, and JARVIS wouldn't have samples of that in young men Natasha's control similarly is unusual. <<
True. Steve is pretty easy to learn because he's consistent. Bucky is more erratic due to the energy source. Natasha is hard to read because she's a spy and has a nearly flat affect.
>> He's probably in the past observed in the aggregate, but does so much less simply because he's got the 'spy-sense'; a buffer now (whether that's five seconds or a smaller amount) that keeps getting dumped when people aren't 'of interest'. <<
I suspect that JARVIS considers public places to be acceptable people-watching areas. That helps a lot. But almost everything he's had to learn from is either public or business interactions. What's left is Tony -- who bends the hell out of any relationship he's in, which does not make for easily generalized data.
With a whole team to observe in family space, JARVIS has much better opportunities to learn about more kinds of relationships.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
dancing_serpent
Re: Thoughts
Date: 2014-01-06 12:01 am (UTC)That's true. The portrayal in The Avengers is the most broken I've ever seen, and a lot more plausible based on the horrific background. You can see in the way Bruce moves that he expects to be hit or yelled at, and he's just resigned to it. I think that's what makes Tony and JARVIS so protective of him from the beginning, and later on, the other Avengers.
>> Bucky and Steve have got motion tape from their time, and JARVIS wouldn't have samples of that in young men Natasha's control similarly is unusual. <<
True. Steve is pretty easy to learn because he's consistent. Bucky is more erratic due to the energy source. Natasha is hard to read because she's a spy and has a nearly flat affect.
>> He's probably in the past observed in the aggregate, but does so much less simply because he's got the 'spy-sense'; a buffer now (whether that's five seconds or a smaller amount) that keeps getting dumped when people aren't 'of interest'. <<
I suspect that JARVIS considers public places to be acceptable people-watching areas. That helps a lot. But almost everything he's had to learn from is either public or business interactions. What's left is Tony -- who bends the hell out of any relationship he's in, which does not make for easily generalized data.
With a whole team to observe in family space, JARVIS has much better opportunities to learn about more kinds of relationships.