ysabetwordsmith (
ysabetwordsmith) wrote2024-11-16 03:29 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
What is science fiction?
When do new technological developments become 'realism' and not 'the future'? Writing about humans flying through the air in strange machines was once SF, but Snakes on a Plane isn't.
Discuss.
Discuss.
no subject
Yes ...
I find "near-future science fiction" useful because it contains a high proportion of stories based entirely on current technology and/or projections of "if we do X, then this could happen." Many cautionary tales are in there. But it's still a subgenre defined by its time period more than its content.
"Hard science fiction" is supposed to be based only on things that fit with what we currently think we know about how the world works. But that leaves room for stuff we haven't invented yet, as long as it doesn't actively conflict with current theories of whatever.
Re: Yes ...
There were medieval tales of people being taken up to Heaven by angels and meeting God - they were the science fiction of their time.
no subject
Using a few examples from Heinlein, Starman Jones totally missed programming languages for computers. It's all machine language (and apparently from *scratch* at that).
In Space Cadets and at least one other of his juveniles, he has cellphones.
In Between Planets he's got radar stealthed watercraft! And not by "magic" tech either. Note that this was in 1951!
A quick check shows that Between Planets is the other book with cell phones. It's on the first page!