ysabetwordsmith (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
ysabetwordsmith) wrote2021-01-29 08:58 pm
ysabetwordsmith) wrote2021-01-29 08:58 pm
Clipping the Hedge Fund
Here is a rare story about rich people losing. :D Now for the important points...
1) Hedge funds do a lot of harm. We would be better off without them, because it is a gambling problem that hurts everyone, not just the people with a gambling problem.
2) This backlash happened because a bunch of ordinary people objected to a few rich fucks artificially manipulating the system in ways that hurt companies they cared about. So they did something about it. This touches on the original reason why investment was invented: it allows people to pool resources so they can have things nobody could afford individually. Build a marketplace. Buy shares in a trading ship. That sort of thing. Today it can be used to salvage businesses that sell stuff we want or need. This is related to Community Supported Enterprise, just discontiguous rather than local, which is apt for far-flung businesses.
3) We are many, they are few. The inherent flaw of inequality is that it's unstable and vulnerable to attack. By definition, the lower layers must be much larger than the upper layers. Previously, it was difficult to mobilize this mass of potential outside of, say, a revolution. But now we have social media: that makes it much easier.
Congratulations, r/WallStreetBets. You put a new tool in the box. Now it's up to everyone else to notice this and use it again, to block rich fucks from jerking the economy around like an abused dog, so we can defend the businesses that we use.
The economy is just a thing that some people made up. It is what we make of it. As a construct, it has no life of its own. So if you don't like it, do something about that. You have a shiny new tool to stick in it, and gods know there are struggling businesses everywhere. Go tell your friends. This tool only works if enough people apply it together. Kind of like democracy.
1) Hedge funds do a lot of harm. We would be better off without them, because it is a gambling problem that hurts everyone, not just the people with a gambling problem.
2) This backlash happened because a bunch of ordinary people objected to a few rich fucks artificially manipulating the system in ways that hurt companies they cared about. So they did something about it. This touches on the original reason why investment was invented: it allows people to pool resources so they can have things nobody could afford individually. Build a marketplace. Buy shares in a trading ship. That sort of thing. Today it can be used to salvage businesses that sell stuff we want or need. This is related to Community Supported Enterprise, just discontiguous rather than local, which is apt for far-flung businesses.
3) We are many, they are few. The inherent flaw of inequality is that it's unstable and vulnerable to attack. By definition, the lower layers must be much larger than the upper layers. Previously, it was difficult to mobilize this mass of potential outside of, say, a revolution. But now we have social media: that makes it much easier.
Congratulations, r/WallStreetBets. You put a new tool in the box. Now it's up to everyone else to notice this and use it again, to block rich fucks from jerking the economy around like an abused dog, so we can defend the businesses that we use.
The economy is just a thing that some people made up. It is what we make of it. As a construct, it has no life of its own. So if you don't like it, do something about that. You have a shiny new tool to stick in it, and gods know there are struggling businesses everywhere. Go tell your friends. This tool only works if enough people apply it together. Kind of like democracy.
Re: Two salient points from the article
(Anonymous) 2021-01-31 02:51 am (UTC)(link)And if enough people choose to lose in a way that makes the win inconvenient or unpleasant...
Re: Two salient points from the article
Re: Two salient points from the article