ysabetwordsmith: Cartoon of me in Wordsmith persona (Default)
ysabetwordsmith ([personal profile] ysabetwordsmith) wrote2014-06-13 01:45 pm

Tesla for Everyone

The Tesla company, a leading manufacturer of electric cars, has just ditched their patents in favor of placing that information into open source access.  The goal is to encourage more people to use the designs to create more and better zero-emission cars.  

Like copyright, patents began as a way of protecting intellectual property so that people could profit from their work and would thereby be encouraged to invent more things, thus benefitting everyone.  Currently patents have become a morass of legal mayhem that stifles innovation as much as copyright does.  The current trend toward open-source work shows how sharing instead of hoarding can also result in more goodies for everyone.  

The challenge we have here is making sure that our creators -- whatever their field -- have some reliable way of making a living so that they can make the goodies we all enjoy.  Crowdfunding is great for individual projects.  Some people have done really well at it.  I'm one of them; although it's not enough for a secure living, it's a stupendous success in light of poetry's marginal position in this society.  But crowdfunding doesn't tend to produce a steady  income stream.  Some other things that have been proposed include a Basic Income and a Reverse Income Tax, both of which would ensure that everyone has enough to meet basic needs.  We need to do something, because it's clear that corporations no longer want to employ people at a living wage, so we can't rely on them to keep the economy running anymore.  Somebody else needs to step in and make sure that citizens have a way to meet their needs, so that they can do things like invent stuff, write stuff, raise the next generation, and pay bills.
dialecticdreamer: My work (Default)

excited

[personal profile] dialecticdreamer 2014-06-13 07:08 pm (UTC)(link)
By Tesla Motors' decision not to pursue patent infringements, which is NOT "giving up the patents". They still own them. They were still first, and still in the history books for the farthest range electric vehicle to date. But what they WILL do, by not enforcing patents, is create a SWATH of third-party elements which COMBINE SEAMLESSLY with the Tesla engine in order to boost range, reduce operational energy use, and a horde of other details that Tesla simply does not have TIME to hammer out while still trying to meet the overwhelming demand for the cars as they are touted today.

A few people will try to manufacture Tesla engines as they appear on the patents, sure, but there's no way they can compete with production on that scale. And Tesla is in effect promising to turn a blind eye to every. single. attempt.

Where this is going to be a G-dsend, isn't in the US market. This will open India, Japan, China, both North and South Korea, and Saudi Arabia, among others, to a /quick/ path to copied-Tesla engines put into the cheapest local chassis available.

In five years, the number of electric cars on the road INTERNATIONALLY will have grown exponentially. (Of course, as the number still hovers depressingly close to zero, there's PLENTY of room for improvements.)

And Tesla Motors will be free to focus on their CURRENT design goal: an all-electric car with a 500 mile range (That's FIVE times what the American automakers consider sufficient for their customers.) And I hope they achieve that within two years, because THAT innovation is what will push the costs of the two-year-old Teslas down closer to middle-class-affordable levels.

dialecticdreamer: My work (Default)

Re: excited

[personal profile] dialecticdreamer 2014-06-13 08:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I'd be pretty upset. A Tesla is on our "win the lottery" wish list.