see_also_friend ([personal profile] see_also_friend) wrote in [personal profile] ysabetwordsmith 2023-03-27 04:05 pm (UTC)

Re: Yes ...

>>Both vitally important boundaries. I will note that doing anything in public undermines the "private" argument. But a closed shed is in no way ambiguous.<<

A closed sketchbook is more private than one in your lap, but body language and position will often indicate how private the contents are. A painting in a group studio will be looked at, but people shouldn't offer criticism on the painting unless invited to do so (though a sincere compliment is probably fine).

It's like door etiquette - doors are boundaries, but how you interact with them depends on a lot of things: status, position of the door, familiarity/context...

>>The main exception I've seen is theatrical folks, who have lower than average boundaries. After you've stripped off a million times and helped a castmate stuff her boobs into a bodice, you just stop caring or even noticing.<<

Well, also control for different ingroup/outgroup expectations. People might be totally chill about castmates or crewmates seeing them half-naked, but object to some random person off the street seeing them half-naked. Ditto for context - appropriately dressed for the theatre might still feel uncomfortable at work/in class/at church.

And while the practicalities of theatre* (open, permeable space) often mean you can't ban all the non-theatre folks during rehearsal, it would still feel a bit weird to have a lot of outsiders unexpectedly come and watch a very rough rehearsal.
*might apply in other contexts, like ice skating rinks

...any theatre folks out there want to weigh in?

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting