That sounds like a logical possibility. Certainly there were many small-to-medium mammals underfoot. Scavengers are successful, so some of those mammals would have eaten whatever they could get. Stashing a dinosaur would have worked. It would also increase the chance of fossilization.
Now I am wondering if anyone has discovered this but not recognized it as such. It might be discernible through patterns of teeth marks on bones and/or tunnel marks left in the surrounding rock/mud. Some paleontologist could have a grand old time pursuing that hypothesis through museums and fossil beds.
I remember reading about this and it made me wonder how many other scavengers did things like this at lucky opportunities. Can you imagine the lucky rodent that managed to find a woolly mammoth carcass and maybe lived in the giant meat house if it was freezing weather?
(no subject)
Date: 2017-07-11 09:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2017-07-11 02:38 pm (UTC)... I know that feel. *lol*
Now, I wonder if some small badger-analogous creature was doing this to dinosaurs...
Hmm...
Date: 2017-07-16 06:54 pm (UTC)Now I am wondering if anyone has discovered this but not recognized it as such. It might be discernible through patterns of teeth marks on bones and/or tunnel marks left in the surrounding rock/mud. Some paleontologist could have a grand old time pursuing that hypothesis through museums and fossil beds.
(no subject)
Date: 2017-07-11 04:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2017-07-15 05:03 pm (UTC)